The previous content of this post has been removed due to me shaking in my knees and wetting my pants when I received news about a possible lawsuit against me for 'defamation'.
(20 March 2009, Friday 9.20am)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
*choke on saliva*
weird, why he felt being turned away then he still stick there?
Umm I don't know too... He's pretty much in a world of his own.
Haha... Looks like you have huge problem with over-charming and muscular men.
From your personality, guess that only the intellectual-editorial types suit you most.
Hmmm..now back to your amazing stories about Mr Gordan under the moonlight; wouldn't that be considered "slanderous" when viewed through a different key hole?
One: He is not over-charming.
(Unless you meant that as a joke) hah!
Two: Are facts considered slanderous? Then you're looking through a wrong keyhole.
Yes.. Facts are not slanderous by its nature. It is the way in the expression of facts to other homo sapiens that can be slanderous, especially if it inspire a prejudice statement.
Hmm... ha..sounds a bit familiar with some events in Genesis? The serpent did spoke of truth when he lead Eve to the forbidden fruit... well, of course we know it is "near truth". I start to wonder if the word "slander" has its origin with snakes?
There are always three sides to a situation: Your story, their story and the truth.
No doubt, I may be biased in my relation to what happened. At least that's how he came across to me.